Skip to content

Malefaction

February 17, 2012

Malefaction means “wrongdoing.” The word relates to Middle English and Latin words meaning “to perform badly.” Which leads to another sense of the word: “impotence.”

Republican Congressman Darrell Issa might know the meaning of the word.

On February 16, he blocked testimony from a woman who favors President Obama’s move to require health insurance plans, including those available to women at Catholic-affiliated hospitals and universities, to offer birth control for free.

We might wonder just how impotent Congressman Issa considers himself to be if he’s afraid of the power of one woman’s words.

The panel of witnesses this committee Chairman deemed “eligible” to speak? All men.

The elected representatives conducting the hearing? All men.

A male faction.

We might ask, of course, how these guys feel about health insurance coverage for Viagra.

Before walking out of the hearing in protest, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney of New York said to the committee members:

What I want to know is: where are the women? When I look at this panel, I don’t see one single woman representing the tens of millions of women across the country who want and need insurance coverage for basic preventive healthcare services, including family planning. Where are the women?

DemocracyNow.org has posted clips from the committee meeting. You can also see (and read transcripts of) interviews with Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, who also walked out of the hearing, and the witness who was barred from testifying.

The silenced woman? That’s Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke. Ms. Fluke is a third-year law student and past president of Georgetown Law Students for Reproductive Justice. Georgetown is a Catholic university; its health plan does not cover contraception.

Ms. Fluke tells the harrowing story of a woman whose lack of access to birth control pills — which at times are medically necessary for treating hormonal imbalances — led to surgical removal of an ovary.

“She has polycystic ovarian syndrome,” Fluke says. “And as a result of that, the doctors are very concerned that she’s going into early menopause at the age of 32. And, of course, this will cause complications for her ever trying to conceive a child and puts her at increased risk for heart disease, osteoporosis and cancer.”

The bonus is a clip of  Andrea Mitchell’s interview on MSNBC with Foster Friess, the most generous donor to Rick Santorum’s super PAC. Here’s his take on health insurance coverage for the relative expense of various methods of birth control:

And this contraceptive thing — my gosh, it’s so — it’s such inexpensive. You know, back in my days, they used Bayer aspirin for contraceptives. The gals put it between their knees, and it wasn’t that costly.

Now there’s some malefaction for ya’.

For counterpoint, here’s an edited excerpt from The Woman’s Belly Book, Appendix One, “Women’s’ Bellies in History and Culture”:

As the Inquisition massacred hundreds of thousands of European midwives, herbalists, and healers, the Church eliminated women’s knowledge of methods for contraception. Unlimited reproduction served to populate congregations, colonies, armies, factories, and markets.

In the United States, from the 19th century through the first decades of the 20th century, information about preventing conception—even about preventing venereal disease—was deemed to be obscene. Making such information available was punishable by a thirty-year prison sentence.

Nearly half of all pregnancies in the United States are accidental, including more than 30% of pregnancies occurring among married couples. Yet organizations of church and state attempt to reduce access to contraception.

Organizations of state, that is, such as the House of Representatives.

I restrained myself from including the word “patriarchy” in the title of this post. I really don’t want to say that the patriarchy is alive and well. Perhaps in this case we’re seeing some of its many last gasps in a long process of demise.

I’ve been doing my best, these past several years, to shrug the gender-oppression chip off my shoulder. But Foster Friess, Rick Santorum, and you boys in Congress: you’re sure not helping.

6 Comments leave one →
  1. February 18, 2012 11:56 am

    Thanks for speaking up and out Lisa! It’s because of voices like yours that “we’re seeing some of its many long gasps in a long process of demise.” The demise is real – which is exciting, but it’s also long – which is not as exciting!

  2. February 18, 2012 12:47 pm

    Thanks so much for your comment. And huzzah to you for your work empowering women to envision and speak up for a world that supports luscious living!

  3. Laurie Lingemann permalink
    February 18, 2012 3:56 pm

    Excellent put-together; I couldn’t agree more. I love the tying in of the past to the present. It’s scary to see the suppression of women repeated over and over again – but this time we’re not silent and nobody is bowing their heads.

  4. February 18, 2012 9:05 pm

    Thanks for your comment, Laurie! And you’re so right — silence and submission are not options.

    What helps me keep the faith is that the cultural and political “powers that be” wouldn’t be making such a fuss about women’s reproductive freedom if they didn’t know how powerful women truly are.

    My take? We embody the pro-creative power — the power not only to bring forth new life but also to promote creation in any dimension we choose — that’s kin to the Power of Being that generates, sustains, and transforms the world.

    Whew! That’s a lot for one sentence. Still, that’s what I know for sure!

    Regards,
    Lisa

  5. Lily permalink
    February 24, 2012 2:00 pm

    I don’t believe its about men vs. women.
    Its about what tax dollars are being spent on and considering this country is falling deeper and deeper in debt by the day and my taxes are spiralling out of control, I think its time we prioritize. There are several drugs to deal with PCOS besides birth control pills.
    If a religion does not believe in birth control, that is their right and they should not have to compromise their belief system to help others. The separation of church and state is important. Personally, I think abortion and birth control are personal issues and should be decided by the individual. Others should not be asked to agree nor disagree with a woman’s decisioin. If she doesn’t like the insurance policy, (and not many ppl do…we all compromise…not everything is going to be covered) then go to Planned Parenthood or get a different policy or go to one of the many women’s organization that will help. Not everything should be dictated by government. I have yet to see a governmental agency run well.
    Should Issa have heard Fluke? No. She is a law student. He could have heard the woman afflicted with PCOS but Fluke’s testimony is hearsay and only an opinion.

  6. February 24, 2012 2:26 pm

    Lily, thanks so much for your comment. I appreciate your taking the time and energy to voice your thoughts and feelings.

    I totally agree with you that the separation of church and state is important, and that abortion and birth control are personal issues best addressed within the realm of a woman’s own authority. I love what you write: “Others should not be asked to agree nor disagree with a woman’s decision.”

    I do believe there’s a difference between being a member of a religious congregation, a believer, and being an employee of or student at an institution affiliated with a religious denomination. Seems to me that employees and students deserve equal protection under the law, same as what employees and students at institutions without religious affiliation receive.

    Institutions affiliated with religious denominations — for example, colleges and hospitals — often take funding from state and federal government. So the separation between church and state is indeed pretty murky.

    I believe the hearing that Congressman Issa chaired was about a regulation regarding private health insurance, not about the allocation of tax dollars to fund birth control. If the question is about cost-effectiveness, though, let’s consider the cost of birth control in relation to the cost of unwanted pregnancies and all that follows from them.

    Again, thanks for your comment. May we all find our way to equity and clarity!

    Regards,
    Lisa

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.